Stanley Bronstein has started his iWarriorWalk USA Walking Tour
in all 50 states


Follow him on his other blogsite at
iWarriorWalk.com

Subscribe to this Blog

Click to Subscribe by RSS

Or Subscribe by Email:


Click Book To Read
AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DC DE FL GA HI IA ID IL IN KS KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS
MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WA WI WV WY
CLICK 2 DIGIT STATE CODE TO FIND OUT WHEN STANLEY'S iWARRIORWALK TOUR COMES TO YOUR STATE
The 2010 iWarriorWalk USA Tour started 23 days 8 hours 26 minutes ago.
Only 84 days 15 hours 33 minutes until the iWarriorWalk Charity Walkathon on Nov 26, 2010







Click Buttons For Info

Abstinence Is Sometimes Better Than Moderation

by Stanley Bronstein on August 10, 2009

Abstinence – Any self-restraint, self-denial, or forbearance.

Moderation – Avoidance of extremes or excesses.

Abstinence And Moderation Are Two Sides Of The Same Coin

That coin is restraint.

The only difference between abstinence and moderation is the level of restraint.

Abstinence is taking it to an extreme.  The point of today’s postiAng is to suggest that just because abstinence is an extreme, it’s not necessarily bad.

For example:

A person has a history as an alcoholic (or at least someone who likes to drink a lot).  Some people should say that all that person needs to learn how to do is to drink in moderation.  After all, if they would simply drink in moderation, they would have no problem.  Their drinking would never get out of control and everything would be just fine.

But, just suppose that person has an extreme personality.  They have a demonstrated history of doing things to extremes.  For them, when it comes to alcohol, there may be no such thing as moderation.  Instead, it may be an all or nothing proposition.  When they do NOT drink, there is no problem.  When they have one teeny tiny drink, it leads to another, then to another, then to another and then to another.  Next thing you know, they’ve had too much to drink.

So for that type of person, I ask you which is better.  Drinking in moderation or totally abstaining from drinking?  Then I want to ask you a second question.  Which is easier for the person?

Abstaining Is Sometimes The Key

In the example shown above, I think abstaining is not only better, but it is probably also easier.

Giving something up completely removes the temptation.  Asking a person to moderate their behavior frequently requires an even greater level of self-control than giving something up entirely.

I realize that may not make sense, but it is true.  That’s why Alcoholics Anonymous teaches its members to totally abstain from drinking.

These Same Principles Can Apply To Other Areas As Well

Another place where this principle applies is in the area of weight loss. The only difference is that one cannot totally abstain from eating. HOWEVER, they can learn how to abstain from certain foods; to abstain from the ones that have given them problems in the past.

Some Recommended Reading

Laws Of Positioning #24 – Position Yourself To Be Disciplined

Popularity: 1% [?]

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you Stumble It!
Until next time, take care. Stanley F. Bronstein
Have you checked out my website that profiles the benefits of walking? iWarriorWalk.com

RSS feed | Trackback URI

No Comments »

Start the discussion by leaving a comment

What do you think? Join the discussion...

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Website
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)